Missional Morality – Balancing the Tension Between “Extreme Legalism” and “All-out License”
I usually consider myself fairly open-minded. That's how I normally come across to those who walk into our church for the first time. In fact, that's the kind of ethos we've been working very hard to establish within our community of faith. Everyone is welcome, regardless of creed, gender, sexual orientation, education, or economic status. A single mother once walked in after I'd been pastor for a few months and said: "I used to come here...until I had my son...and then all I received was judgement." She had stopped coming for about 10 years. And although I personally had nothing to do with her reason for departure, I felt a corporate responsibility to ask for her forgiveness on behalf of our church, and told her that she was welcome back with open arms, without fear of judgement.
I believe that the missional church movement has done much to correct the old saying: "I don't smoke, I don't chew, and I don't date guys/girls who do." As a pastor with the denomination, I was even presented with the option of drinking alcohol at my own discretion, a choice unavailable 10 years ago. We have missional church planters meeting in pubs and bars discussing the latest trends and innovations of church. Such groups believe that "drinking holes" and other common areas of community (i.e. restaurants, poker games, Starbucks) should be the church's mission field, and rightly so. Hell, let's even light a cigar once in a while.
We are coming out from a time in church when being Christian meant you didn’t smoke, you didn’t drink (alcohol, that is), and you didn’t have sex before marriage. And because that became our focus, it turned into legalism. For many years we were quick to judge and we failed to love people regardless of their background. If people didn’t fit our Christian "box", then they were rejected. Now, in the last decade or so, many churches have realized how wrong we have been in turning away so many people looking for love, acceptance and ultimately, God. We’ve become more missional. We are feeding the poor, we care for the orphan and the widow, we speak up for social justice issues, we buy more expensive bottled water so that part of the proceeds will go to dig wells in Africa for people without clean drinking water.
However, I have an increasing suspicion that the missional church's message of openness and acceptance has unintentionally aided in swinging the pendulum from "extreme legalism" to "all-out license." My suspicions continue to be confirmed over time. I have had numerous conversations with young men and women regarding sexuality where inevitably, the questions center upon how far they can push the "boundaries" before it is considered sinning, such as: Is oral sex wrong? Is masturbation wrong? What about "dry humping"? Is it possible to be a spiritual virgin again once I've lost my physical virginity? (I was actually asked that last question). I am continually asked to intervene in situations where the individuals' experimenting with sex, alcohol and drugs have gone too far. Weekend drunken sprees have become the norm among the college and career groups. Each of these circumstances I have encountered among communities of faith.
In many senses, then, I contend that parts of our missional faith communities look exactly like Hollywood. "Let's feed the poor, care for the earth, wipe out AIDS in Africa. But...no one should tell us what to do with our money, how much we should drink, or what we can or cannot do with our bodies."
I propose that the solution to "extreme legalism" is not "all-out license", but missional morality.
What then is missional morality? Well, If we follow Jesus, then we should love our neighbours, hang out with them, watch a flick, have a beer or two, go dancing– go into the marketplace – AND TRANSFORM IT. I’m pretty sure Jesus is fine with drinking a little wine or beer, but getting hammered is a different story. I’m pretty sure he'd be alright with dancing, but bumping and grinding against someone who’s not your spouse is a little iffy. All of us know how Jesus feels about sexual activity outside of marriage. No question about that, he was very clear. Jesus was the one who equated lusting after other women with adultery. He was the one who equated cursing another person as murder in spirit. He said that he had came not to abolish the law and the prophets, but to fulfill them. No one would ever accuse Jesus of being a legalist, since even his enemies charged him of being a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and "sinners."
Most missional individuals would identify Jesus as their prime example. One of the core attributes of missional living would be a renewed appreciation and reverence for the life and teachings of Jesus. I believe Jesus to be the most missional person to have ever lived. Jesus loved the poor, he elevated the status of abused women, he ate and communed with sinners and prostitutes.
I also believe Jesus to be the most moral person to have ever lived. Jesus did not sin, and he never condoned the sinful behaviour of those whose sins he forgave. For example, once the legalists had left the scene, to the adulteress Jesus said, "Neither do I condemn you. Go now and leave your life of sin." Zacchaeus the tax collector was so moved by Jesus' presence as his dinner guest that his repentance and restoration resulted in him giving HALF his possessions to the poor and pledging to pay back FOUR TIMES the amount of anything he cheated off another. On one occasion, a "sinful" woman wet his feet with her tears, and proceeded to kiss Jesus' feet, wipe them with her hair, and pour perfume on them. To her Jesus said: "Your sins are forgiven, your faith has saved you, go in peace."
I have seen people enter our churches looking for redemption and leave because they were judged for sinful mistakes of the past. I now see people being accepted into our churches, regardless of their sinful habits, with no desire on their part for a redemptive morality and no "back-bone" on the church's part to call them to account. I wonder what our churches would look like where sins are forgiven yet not tolerated, and sinners are restored yet continue to be exhorted to"sin no more."
For years now we have been challenged to be as missional as Jesus was. Perhaps it is high time we follow his example of morality as well. He once said:
"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill and cummin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.
I believe missional morality is, in the words of Jesus, "practicing the latter, without neglecting the former."

Pomo
27 Mar, 2009
Nice first post, hope for many more in the future.
Denise Charles
1 Apr, 2009
While I do agree wholeheartedly with the premise of a missional paradigm, as with any movement we must be aware that too far east is most definitely west. While God is calling us into relationship with our communities and while we as the church have always been called to live the Gospel there must be no compromise with sin. If we take note of Jesus' encounters with people and if the missional paradigm proports to follow the path of Jesus then even as we embrace others we must do it as Jesus did. In all of Jesus' interactions with sinners His message was usually "neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more"; this was always clear. God does not expect us to grow comfortable with sin so that we can reach others; Jesus is clear on showing others what a life of righteousness is; He never tows the middle. At the end of the day, the goal of a missional way of life must not be to make people so comfortable with sin that coming to church is a breeze. The holiness of Christ challenged those with whom He came into contact to turn from sin, so even as He hung out with publicans and sinners it was never from a stance of participating in their falleness. This is not something to make light of; the walk of the cross is a walk of holiness and righteousness. Yes we did go extreme with the stance of legalism in expecting us all to look the same and sound the same once we were Christians; but the definition of Christian/church must not change. We are the ecclesia or called out ones, called to be salt and light. We can only be this if our lifestyle is different as a result of our own personal transformation by the power of Jesus Christ. At the same time we must rid ourselves of the "Christian club mentality" if we hope to reach the lost. I would hate to see the concept of missional become degenerated to a point where there seems to be a complete absence of standards and where people think that anything goes. Mind you, from my readings of Michael Frost and my watching of a number of videos I do not believe that this is the true definition of missional but ultimately as people get hooked on a new word and on a movement there is always the possibility of it being watered down and evolving into something that it was never meant to be. This is why it is necessary to keep the dialogue gong but to also lace it with prayer and a careful study of the scriptures. I do agree with your stance of a need for balance.
For a continuation of this conversation also check out my blog at http://insideout2.wordpress.com. I am from Barbados in the Caribbean and my husband and I are Pastors who have recently planted a church with a missional and external focus.
Pomo
1 Apr, 2009
Thanks for your thoughts.
My sense is missional does not make light of sin but probably doesn't bring it at the forefront like old conservatism did. So rather than noting the degradation of humanity because of the awfulness of sin, missional tries to communicate the foundational message in a language people in a context can understand: they are disconnected from Jesus (because of their Fallen state).
Prayer yes, scriptures yes, (albeit your careful study of scriptures will undoubtedly yield different conclusions so then we are left with 'who's right?).
So missionality doesn't make a compromise around sin, but doing is better than talking. One church will condemn sin and in turn never go out and try to redeem creation. They are more big talk then action. I'd much rather a long journey with someone who does not know Jesus (let's face, everyone sins, so stop pointing out other people's sin as the object of your mission) than sitting in a church pew and thinking about pure everyone inside is.
Denise Charles
2 Apr, 2009
Thanks so much for your response. Of course I am not suggesting that we look our noses down at others by pointing out sin from a seeming position of superiority. The entire concept of being salt and light is that our world views and life styles are so distinctly different yet we are so motivated by love that the world must sit up and take notice. The church's role should never be one of condemnation. I believe wholeheartedly in building relationships with those who do not know Christ but I must be willing to be honest about what a life of righteousness means both in word and in deed and this is of course communicated from a heart of love. We both should know that love is no airy-fairy emotion based on mere talk, according to 1 Cor. 13, it is pure action.
Pomo
2 Apr, 2009
Agreed.
The missional church seeks to be a noticeably different community within the city. I have found none who only put on different pants to look cool/water down the gospel message.
Only people who do that are ministries/outreach events of big box churches looking to do something 'different'.
Mick Porter
27 May, 2009
Hi,
This tension is very interesting; we seem to move to "either/or" scenarios very quickly, and it certainly *can* mean that one kind of sin increases as another decreases. One problem is that we separate out moral-type sin from social-type sin.
If you're interested, I've got a video that probes this a bit:
http://unveiledface.blogspot.com/2009/05/jesus-christ-left-wing-or-right-wing.html
It's part of a DVD series we made over here in Australia.
In Him,
Mick