<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives &#187; Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pomotheo.com/category/theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pomotheo.com</link>
	<description>Join the missional conversation from Canada.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>A uniquely Canadian approach to the emerging post-modern, post-church, post-evangelical, emergent, missional conversation.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.pomotheo.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>ro@pomotheo.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>ro@pomotheo.com (PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>2009</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Joining the post-modern, post-church, post-evangelical, emergent, missional conversation from Canada.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>missional, church, christian, canada</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Religion &amp; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
		<item>
		<title>Church Sign Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/church-life/church-sign-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/church-life/church-sign-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomotheo.com/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was walking to a Flames game and had to snap a picture of this sign at a hidden church in downtown Calgary. All I can say is FAIL. Here's why. First off, anybody who reads the sign, which is &#8230; <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/church-life/church-sign-fail/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/church-life/church-sign-fail/">Church Sign Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was walking to a Flames game and had to snap a picture of this sign at a hidden church in downtown Calgary. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/church-sign.jpg"><img src="http://www.pomotheo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/church-sign-202x300.jpg" alt="church sign calgary" title="church sign" width="202" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-985" /></a></p>
<p>All I can say is FAIL. Here's why.</p>
<p><span id="more-984"></span></p>
<p>First off, anybody who reads the sign, which is probably tens of thousands a day, won't have a CLUE what it means. </p>
<p>What does a sign with "Kingdom of God" mean to people who don't even go to church???</p>
<p>What some who used to do the church thing (or have heard of people who do), will recognize is 'born again'--that buzzword from the 70's generally used in the pejorative today. </p>
<p>Secondly, people who are churched might not even understand the sign. What does 'seeing the Kingdom of God' actually mean? (And apparently this whole Kingdom of God thing is only for men.)</p>
<p>Thirdly, the sign is wrong. </p>
<p>I get what they're trying to say (or at last how I interpret it). If you haven't said a 'prayer' to get to 'heaven' then you won't see the 'Kingdom'. So get on your knees and be 'born again'!</p>
<p>FAIL. </p>
<p>Not only will the sign not work but the theology is wrong. </p>
<p>Using words like 'Kingdom' imply, in orthodox Christianity, the ushering in of God's ultimately dream of righting all the wrongs. Because we live in a liminal space, the <em>now but not yet</em> time where the Kingdom has <strong>now</strong> been glimpsed in Christ and joined by the church, but <strong>not yet</strong> in realised in full, the Kingdom IS seen. </p>
<p>Ironically, the church who put up the sign ARE the ones who should be glimpsing moments of God's Kingdom on earth by <em>being participants in a mission to right wrongs</em>.</p>
<p>Next time they should put something at least semi controversial for the right reasons, perhaps something drole? Any suggestions?
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/church-life/church-sign-fail/">Church Sign Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/church-life/church-sign-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapture is a Scam &#8211; NT Wright on 1 Thess 4:16-17</title>
		<link>http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/theology/rapture-is-a-scam-nt-wright-on-1-thess-416-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/theology/rapture-is-a-scam-nt-wright-on-1-thess-416-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pomo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lahaye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomotheo.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You've heard it from us a few times already, Left Behind is perhaps one of the biggest theological cancers ever to propagate from fundamentalist Christianity. The fact dispensationalism (rapture theology) is affirmed as foundational doctrine for many evangelicals only makes &#8230; <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/theology/rapture-is-a-scam-nt-wright-on-1-thess-416-17/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/theology/rapture-is-a-scam-nt-wright-on-1-thess-416-17/">Rapture is a Scam &#8211; NT Wright on 1 Thess 4:16-17</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You've heard it from us a few times already, <i>Left Behind</i> is perhaps one of the biggest theological cancers ever to propagate from fundamentalist Christianity. The fact dispensationalism (rapture theology) is affirmed as foundational doctrine for many evangelicals only makes the problem worse. Why? Because of basic exegesis and scholarship yields alternate interpretations than the single (Tim Lahaye would argue) verse perscribing rapture.</p>
<p>But don't take our word, here's a quick article I stumbbled one written by heavyweight theologian NT Wright (who blasts poor Tim out of the water on anything Bible IMO).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_BR_Farewell_Rapture.htm" target="_blank">Nt Wright on the rapture</a> (1 Thess).
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/theology/rapture-is-a-scam-nt-wright-on-1-thess-416-17/">Rapture is a Scam &#8211; NT Wright on 1 Thess 4:16-17</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/lahaye' rel='tag' target='_self'>lahaye</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/rapture' rel='tag' target='_self'>rapture</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/wright' rel='tag' target='_self'>wright</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pomotheo.com/2011/theology/rapture-is-a-scam-nt-wright-on-1-thess-416-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Evangelicals Inept at Raising Post-Modern Leaders?</title>
		<link>http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/why-denominations-are-inept-at-raising-post-modern-leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/why-denominations-are-inept-at-raising-post-modern-leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pomo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomotheo.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated March 4th. Modern denominations, which include pretty much everyone, but I'll pick on evangelicals because they tend to think they're cutting edge when it comes to connecting with the world around them, are doing a poor job raising post-modern &#8230; <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/why-denominations-are-inept-at-raising-post-modern-leaders/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/why-denominations-are-inept-at-raising-post-modern-leaders/">Are Evangelicals Inept at Raising Post-Modern Leaders?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated March 4th.</p>
<p>Modern denominations, which include pretty much everyone, but I'll pick on evangelicals because they tend to think they're cutting edge when it comes to connecting with the world around them, are doing a poor job raising post-modern leaders from within. </p>
<p>Why? I think it's because they measure success and new leaders with a modern lens and thus can only conclude inadequacy. </p>
<p>For leaders, in an effort to minimize the loss of new leaders, the solution is to get these individuals to prove or gain experience. Make them work in the modern attractional consumer church for a few years to see if they 'get it' before accepting the rick of a 'trial' or 'test' model of post-modern church.</p>
<p>Success, on the other hand, is not measured in the transformation of a few, but whether an event captures the attention of many. Regardless of their initiatives do anything they must at least give the impression to people that they've done something. Although they claim efficiency (church development) they combine energies and impact few. </p>
<p>What's going to happen? Post-modern leaders won't play the game. If postmodernity is really a completely different culture than what's found in current evangelical modern churches, then being trained within that setting detrimental at worse and boring at best. </p>
<p><span id="more-224"></span></p>
<p>Here's a discussion between two young pastors, one employed at a 'emerging-missional' church in a modern denomination. The other, from the same denomination, can't get affirmation to do a post-modern/missional church plant. Read on, it includes a hockey analogy :D </p>
<p>D says: i got two sermons to write before i start on the conference stuff</p>
<p>R says: haha. the life of a modern pastor</p>
<p>D says: wow...you're really cranky these days</p>
<p>R says: i figure i'll talk to anybody who'll listen....which is nobody these days</p>
<p>D says: you're all suited up...u got ur skates on...great stick and glove...but u won't play coz u wanna to change the rules b4 u step on the ice...</p>
<p>R says: hang on</p>
<p>R says: good analogy, i'm thinking</p>
<p>D says: i'm listening</p>
<p>R says: i'm all suited up, i've got my skates on, great stick and glove, but i won't play cause i'd have to do it in front of a crowd that won't even cheer along</p>
<p>R says: i'd rather start my own team and play with people on the ice cause everyone dreams about being on the ice</p>
<p>D says: they ain't gonna listen to u until they know how hard u hit and how fast ur slapshot is</p>
<p>R says: who?<br />
R says: i do'nt care about the owners<br />
R says: all they care about is how many ticket sales they get</p>
<p>D says: so????</p>
<p>R says: they have all the money, but they only control a small segment of th epopulation<br />
R says: little do they know that 80% of the market remains untapped ready to give</p>
<p>D says: this....isn't too bad...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/why-denominations-are-inept-at-raising-post-modern-leaders/">Are Evangelicals Inept at Raising Post-Modern Leaders?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/why-denominations-are-inept-at-raising-post-modern-leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pomotheo Joining TransformingTheology Network</title>
		<link>http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/pomotheo-joining-transformingtheology-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/pomotheo-joining-transformingtheology-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pomo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomotheo.com/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pomotheo is happy to be invited, or should we say we asked to be invited, to a new initiative in the realm of theology. The mission of the Transforming Theology network is to tighten the bonds between theology and transformative &#8230; <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/pomotheo-joining-transformingtheology-network/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/pomotheo-joining-transformingtheology-network/">Pomotheo Joining TransformingTheology Network</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pomotheo is happy to be invited, or should we say we asked to be invited, to a new initiative in the realm of theology. The mission of the <a href="http://transformingtheology.org/">Transforming Theology</a> network is to tighten the bonds between theology and transformative action in the church and the world. </p>
<p><span id="more-312"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The Transforming Theology project pursues a three-pronged approach for deepening the relationship between theology and transformative action. The "Transforming the Church" page describes the denominational summit meeting scheduled for May 2009, as well as steps to strengthen the networks of Christians across the denominations who share with one another the passion for a transforming and transformative theology. The "Seminaries and Divinity Schools" page describes new initiatives in theological education that are helping to train future religious leaders according to these priorities and to disseminate them more broadly.</p>
<p>But what of the third, and no less essential, prong in the effort: theologians themselves? This part of the website, and of our overall project, is dedicated to those theologians who are writing in powerful and accessible ways to transform church and world. We are identifying these men and women, publicizing their work, making their books available to bloggers and to the media, recording interviews with them that can be downloaded as podcasts -- in short, creating a network of theologians whose work is transformative.</p>
<p>Our task is not to establish strict criteria for what counts as acceptable or unacceptable theology. Instead, we join with all Christian thinkers who are involved in formulating, and living, transformative theologies. We are working to bring home the two-directional nature of the organic link between belief and action. Powerful theologies lead to powerful ministries in the church and in the world. But the feedback relationship is no less important: examining transformative ministries, as well as those that fail to be transformative, often provides crucial guidance in how theologies should be extended, adapted -- or radically revised..</p></blockquote>
<p>Our role will be to critique the writings and books we get through out own lens and hopefully we will engage some other blog writers. So stay tuned and enjoy!
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/pomotheo-joining-transformingtheology-network/">Pomotheo Joining TransformingTheology Network</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pomotheo.com/2009/theology/pomotheo-joining-transformingtheology-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Mormons Aren&#8217;t Christians, Period.</title>
		<link>http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/why-mormons-arent-christians-period/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/why-mormons-arent-christians-period/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pomo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/apologetics/why-mormons-arent-christians-period/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pomotheo rarely makes absolute statements but this one we're OK stating. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 10 years ago Mormon refused to be associated/called Christians. Now they realise they can get more money in the bank if they push &#8230; <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/why-mormons-arent-christians-period/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/why-mormons-arent-christians-period/">Why Mormons Aren&#8217;t Christians, Period.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pomotheo rarely makes absolute statements but this one we're OK stating. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 10 years ago Mormon refused to be associated/called Christians. Now they realise they can get more money in the bank if they push their religion as a 'Christian alternative'. </p>
<p>This debate between prominent Christian apologist and LDS author took place over the blogosphere. <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/blogalogue/mormondebate/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://blog.beliefnet.com/blogalogue/mormondebate/</a>. Personally I don't think it was a fair debate since Dr. Mohler is a PhD and Orson is merely an fictional writer. Nonetheless, Orson never answered the main question about the debate, basically "is Mormonism an accurate reflection of orthodox Christianity".
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/why-mormons-arent-christians-period/">Why Mormons Aren&#8217;t Christians, Period.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/why-mormons-arent-christians-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left Behind Junk &#8211; Sound Exegesis Finally Seeping Through</title>
		<link>http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/left-behind-junk-sound-exegesis-finally-seeping-through/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/left-behind-junk-sound-exegesis-finally-seeping-through/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pomo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/left-behind-junk-sound-exegesis-finally-seeping-through/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Death to Left Behind garbage. It's GREAT! to see theologians finally getting their voices heard. Albeit, this particular woman is a Lutheran, evangelicals should take notice. Hopefully arrogant conservatives won't write these theologians off as 'liberal', or in this case &#8230; <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/left-behind-junk-sound-exegesis-finally-seeping-through/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/left-behind-junk-sound-exegesis-finally-seeping-through/">Left Behind Junk &#8211; Sound Exegesis Finally Seeping Through</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.christianpost.com/article/20070125/25400_Professor%3A_Say_No_to_%27Left_Behind%27_Theology.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Death to Left Behind garbage.</a></p>
<p>It's GREAT! to see theologians finally getting their voices heard. Albeit, this particular woman is a Lutheran, evangelicals should take notice. Hopefully arrogant conservatives won't write these theologians off as 'liberal', or in this case 'just a woman'.</p>
<p>Quite frankly, dispensationalist theology, of which 'rapture theology' and the entire 'Left Behind' series is based, does not have a foundation to stand upon. It's dying a slow death, so people, please let it go.</p>
<p>More discussion in the <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=2">PomoTheo Theology Forum</a>.
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/left-behind-junk-sound-exegesis-finally-seeping-through/">Left Behind Junk &#8211; Sound Exegesis Finally Seeping Through</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pomotheo.com/2007/theology/left-behind-junk-sound-exegesis-finally-seeping-through/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predestination and Free Will</title>
		<link>http://www.pomotheo.com/2006/theology/predestination-and-free-will/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pomotheo.com/2006/theology/predestination-and-free-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pomo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomotheo.com/2006/uncategorized/predestination-and-free-will/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This might be interesting and I am open to discussion. Somehow I think I've made sense of the two as they both exist.... Yet it seems unlikely that I truely have comprehended this mystery. Scripture speaks of both God knowing &#8230; <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2006/theology/predestination-and-free-will/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2006/theology/predestination-and-free-will/">Predestination and Free Will</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be interesting and I am open to discussion.  Somehow I think I've made sense of the two as they both exist....  Yet it seems unlikely that I truely have comprehended this mystery.  Scripture speaks of both God knowing all things past-present-future yet He also holds us accountable for our choices which implies we have real choices.  In class my argument was shut down and called a fallacy but I just don't see it... I wrote the professor in hopes that he would help me see it.  The same request goes out to all who can show it.  Please don't be silly and deny either free-will or predestination, you'll never prove that either don't exist.</p>
<div>Opps!  That was silly (the last two emails now…),Hello Dr. Reid,</p>
<p>Hope all is well.</p>
<p>After a great deal of pondering, re-reading email and dictionary definitions, I have concluded that I am in the dark as to this fallacy of confusing truth and epistemology.  This is nearly the worst kind of ignorance, for although I believe you when you say I am confusing the two, I know neither what portion of my thinking does this nor how I am doing it.  If you would be so kind as to alleviate my confusion I would be very appreciative.</p>
<p>In case you don't recall the argument I tested in class I will restate it as best I can.  Unfortunately I can't see where the problem lies and in thinking about it I might have furthered it some, considering that I am now more convinced than ever...</p>
<p>I was saying that since God is All-Knowing and Eternal, the entire past-present-future are all known to God without God being subject to time.  i.e.: He does not know the past-present-future now, or in the past, or in the future but eternally.  God does not change.  By the example in class I was trying to show this is logically consistent.</p>
<p>'Tom <u>will</u> choose to buy a marble tomorrow'.  This speaks of the future, which hasn't happened yet.  It is a statement about something that literally doesn't exist right now.  Because Tom could choose to buy or not buy that marble when tomorrow arrives, right now we do not know and cannot say.  When tomorrow arrives then it <u>will</u> become true or not.</p>
<p>'God knows right <u>now</u> Tom <u>will</u> choose to buy a marble tomorrow'.  Again, by subjecting God to time, it is still impossible to call this statement true or false because right <u>now</u> Tom has not chosen tomorrow whether or not to buy the marble.  Not only is it denying God's Eternal existence but it makes no sense because tomorrow doesn't exist today.</p>
<p>'God knows Tom chooses to buy a marble tomorrow'.  This makes sense since tomorrow, yesterday and today are the same to God who is Eternal.  It will not make sense if one assumes God knows it today, because that is putting God in time, taking time out of the statement for God allows it to be sensible.  When tomorrow arrives, Tom may still choose to buy the marble or not because until it happens he still has the choice.  If Tom chooses not to buy the marble when tomorrow arrives then God never knew that he would buy it.</p>
<p>It is the same with the past, which we know of in the present, yet which no longer exists right now just like the future doesn't exist right now.  To know that Tom chose to buy a marble yesterday doesn't negate Tom's choice that he had yesterday despite us knowing now what he chose.  Today there is no choice for Tom to have or have not bought the marble yesterday, since it has already occurred and the choice no longer exists.  Today Tom has the choice to buy a marble or not but tomorrow his choice will not longer exist.</p>
<p>If we put God in our position of time then the future doesn't exist to God right now just like it doesn't exist to us right now because we only exist in the present.  God is not in a position of time, He is Eternal.</p>
<p>Knowing what happens in all time and not being subject to time God knows that yesterday, today and tomorrow Tom chooses to buy marbles each of those days.  Yet similar to how we know Tom chose to buy a marble yesterday without negating the choice Tom had yesterday, God knowing that Tom will buy a marble tomorrow doesn't negate the choice Tom <u>will</u> have tomorrow.  For temporally, as we are now, tomorrow and yesterday don't exist right now.  Yet eternally, as God is Eternal, tomorrow is as yesterday is as today.</p>
<p>In conclusion it is only when we deny the Eternal aspect of God's divine nature that we face a contradiction between His divine complete knowledge and our free will to choose.  This is the fallacy of confusing the temporal with the eternal, which is what I believe I was doing in the previous argument I had sent you.  This argument is making far too much sense to me now but I am open and wish to see my confusion in confusing truth and epistemology.</p>
<p>-John</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.pomotheo.com/2006/theology/predestination-and-free-will/">Predestination and Free Will</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.pomotheo.com">PomoTheo - Missional Perspectives</a></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pomotheo.com/2006/theology/predestination-and-free-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

